Once the Stacking image is rendered, you should click Save and the dialog will point you into the original capture folder. In Helicon Focus, you should select your rendering method (please refer to the Helicon Focus Documentation) and click Render. Afterwards, Helicon Focus will be opened. Now the selected images will be processed and imported to Helicon Focus. When things are set up the way you need, click on the Edit Variants. The Keep processed variants option can be checked if you want to store the processed work-files in order to have a faster workflow for re-processing the images through Helicon focus at a later time (please see below). It will let you set up the output files that are used in Helicon Focus and some basic adjustments. When the images are selected, they can be sent to Helicon Focus by going to the menu and choosing Image -> Edit Wit h -> Stack in Helicon Focus.Ī dialog will open. Otherwise, you will have to select the images manually. All the images with the same Sequence ID are now selected. If the images are captured using the Focus Stacking tool on the XF Camera, you can select them by Sequence ID (metatag). Select one of the images from the sequence and then choose Select -> Select By Same -> Sequence ID. So to me, it's more than worth the price.When capturing image sequences destined for focus stacking, you can use Capture One to select the appropriate sequence of images. It seems like exactly what I'd expect from a dedicated tool vs the more general processor: it's faster, more effecient on resources and gives me noticeably better results. Even if the quality were the same, I'd buy it for the speed and convenience improvement, as well as the ability to save as DNG, but the image results are better as well. It'll be my normal processor moving forward. Is Helicon Focus worth having? My decision was yes, and I've bought a license. Overall, I'd give the Photoshop result a 7.5 of 10, and the Helicon Focus a 9. I expect it could be ignored, but I'd probably want to try to clean that up a bit. Interestingly, both of them have very slight halos around the yellow flower at the bottom, evidently a rendering artifact from the blurred version in the later images in the stack. Overall, both images are good, but I think the Helicon Focus image is a bit better. Should I be using TIFF instead Or should I really be using the Adobe RAW in DNG out converter when I use Helicon Focus I use an Olympus camera which takes images in proprietary ORF file format, and these ORF files are what I load into Helicon Focus. I like the colors better, the purple flowers on the left are much better, and the yellow center of the flowers on the right are brighter and sharper. I have lots of these DNG files from stacking and retouching images in Helicon Focus. The Helicon Focus in general is brighter and seems sharper to me. Overall, I prefer the Helicon Focus image. The end result (exported as a JPG) by Lightroom: As soon as it finished saving the image, Photoshop crashed (whee!).ĭuring processing, Photoshop grew to take up over 16Gb of memory, and made the system unusable for anything else, something I've only seen happen on this machine while rendering 4K video. After flattening the image, I saved it as an uncompressed TIFF file, which was a 166Mb file. Processing the image took:Ĩ minutes for Photoshop to import the images and be ready to work on themĤ minutes to flatten the image for saving Not the most powerful model but it's pretty well built out.
HELICON FOCUS RAW IN DNG OUT PRO
My current computer is a fairly recent iMac 5K, with a 3.8GHz i5, 25Gb of memory and a Radio Pro 580 GPU. Once that's done, in Photoshop, you select all of the layers and run Edit->Auto-Align images followed by Edit->Auto-Blend layers choosing the stacking option. Photoshop creates a file and loads each image into a separate layer. This fires up Photoshop and hands the 45 images. To run the Photoshop test, I select the 45 images in Lightroom and then choose Photo->Edit in->Open as Layers in Photoshop. That's actually pretty good, but there's some sharpness falloff on the flowers to the right at the back.
0 kommentar(er)
